H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 3-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–1 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–0 on clay, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2005 Palermo third round 6-3 6-4.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 21, 2005* Palermo WTA 250 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 6-3 6-4 Denisa Chladkova #80 Match data
Jul 24, 2004* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #59 6-1 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #63 Match data
Jul 11, 2003* Palermo WTA 250 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #139 6-1 6-7(4) 6-3 Denisa Chladkova #32 Match data
Feb 9, 2001* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Denisa Chladkova #46 6-2 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Denisa Chladkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11