H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 1-2
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 2–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2007 Roland Garros second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2007* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Anabel Medina Garrigues | 7-5 6-4 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| May 4, 2006* | Warsaw | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Elena Likhovtseva | 7-5 4-6 6-1 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2004* | Forest Hills | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 3-6 6-0 6-1 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Elena Likhovtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |