H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Irina Falconi Hartman H2H: 0-1
Irina Falconi Hartman holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Irina Falconi Hartman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Irina Falconi Hartman won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Irina Falconi Hartman | 6-3 6-1 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Irina Falconi Hartman | #1,008 | #63 | 1,005 | 1,614 | 42 | 72 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | Irina Falconi Hartman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #151 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #76 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #99 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 2017 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #129 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #271 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |