H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Jill Craybas H2H: 3-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–1 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–0 on clay, while Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2009 Indian Wells second round 7-5 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 11, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Jill Craybas #102 7-5 3-6 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #19 Match data
May 17, 2006* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 7-5 6-4 Jill Craybas #51 Match data
May 26, 2004* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #67 6-2 6-1 Jill Craybas #61 Match data
Apr 7, 2004* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #75 6-4 6-2 Jill Craybas #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1