H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 3-4

Katarina Srebotnik holds a 4–3 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–1 on clay, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2008 's-Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 4
7 main draw meetings
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 19, 2008* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 500 R32 Grass Katarina Srebotnik #24 6-2 4-6 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
May 25, 2008* Strasbourg WTA 500 F Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #33 4-6 7-6(4) 6-0 Katarina Srebotnik #30 Match data
May 17, 2007* Rome WTA 1000 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-3 6-2 Katarina Srebotnik #20 Match data
Sep 24, 2005* Portoroz WTA 250 QF Hard Katarina Srebotnik #49 6-3 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #27 Match data
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Katarina Srebotnik #57 6-3 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #38 Match data
Jul 12, 2003* Palermo WTA 250 SF Clay Katarina Srebotnik #39 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #139 Match data
Feb 22, 2003* Bogota WTA 250 SF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #528 7-5 6-3 Katarina Srebotnik #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,845 224 204 52.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2000 8–18 30.8% #120 1,484 0 1
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,512 0 1
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,727 0 2
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2004 13–18 41.9% #87 1,596 0 2
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,752 0 4
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,830 0 4
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,740 0 4
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,621 0 4
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11