H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Kimiko Date H2H: 1-3
Kimiko Date holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Kimiko Date won the 2010 Beijing second round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimiko Date | 6-0 6-4 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data | Oct 6, 2010* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-4 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data | Nov 2, 2009 | Tournament of Champions | WTA Finals | RR | Hard |
| Kimiko Date | 6-3 6-3 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data | Sep 27, 2009* | Seoul | WTA 250 | F | Hard |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 6-1 4-6 6-4 | Kimiko Date | Match data | Sep 17, 2009* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,834 | 310 | 278 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Kimiko Date | #1,191 | #4 | 1,280 | 2,091 | 245 | 190 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Kimiko Date | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #119 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #32 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #39 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 27–14 | 65.9% | #21 | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 25–11 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,948 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 32–12 | 72.7% | #9 | 1,985 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,682 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 39–12 | 76.5% | #4 | 2,028 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #8 | 2,076 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #50 | 1,618 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,541 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,491 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 2,048 | 0 | 7 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #69 | 1,845 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 7–24 | 22.6% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #99 | 1,456 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #75 | 1,576 | 0 | 8 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,598 | 0 | 8 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,574 | 0 | 8 |
| 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1191 | 1,564 | 0 | 8 |