H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-2

Lindsay Davenport holds a 2–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Auckland fourth round 6-1 4-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 4, 2008* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #72 6-1 4-6 6-0 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data
Sep 3, 2005* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 — — — — — — — 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54