H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 4-2

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 4–2 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–2 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lourdes Domínguez Lino won the 2014 Charleston second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 2, 2014* Charleston WTA 500 R64 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #76 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #111 Match data
Jul 18, 2013* Bastad WTA 250 R32 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #92 Match data
May 2, 2009* Fes WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #18 7-6(5) 7-6(5) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #97 Match data
May 1, 2008* Fes WTA 250 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 4-6 6-2 6-1 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #99 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 7-5 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #75 Match data
Apr 5, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 6-3 2-6 7-5 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2