H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs María Emilia Salerni H2H: 3-0

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–0 lead over María Emilia Salerni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2008 Amelia Island round of 64 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
María Emilia Salerni
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #29 6-4 6-3 María Emilia Salerni #76 Match data Apr 9, 2008* R64 Amelia Island Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #528 6-3 6-2 María Emilia Salerni #140 Match data Feb 20, 2003* R32 Bogotá Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #69 7-6(6) 6-2 María Emilia Salerni #123 Match data Oct 25, 2001* R32 Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
María Emilia Salerni #328 #65 471 1,556 31 61 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues María Emilia Salerni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% #201 1,503 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 2001 6–11 35.3% #122 1,508 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2002 3–8 27.3% #127 1,486 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2003 0–6 0.0% #173 1,430 0 0
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 2004 7–3 70.0% #115 1,541 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 2005 3–14 17.6% #148 1,452 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 — — — — — — —
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 2007 6–6 50.0% #87 1,500 0 0
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 2008 4–8 33.3% #241 1,468 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2009 1–3 25.0% #330 1,451 0 0
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues María Emilia Salerni
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 3 12 15 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — —
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% — 13 31 44 29.5% 18 27 45 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 14/51 of María Emilia Salerni's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues María Emilia Salerni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/6 1.0 3.0 54.9% 64.3% 30.4% 16.7% 14.3% 49.0% 33.3%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% 2005 2/17 1.5 3.5 57.6% 49.4% 41.0% 60.7% 28.6% 46.1% 35.1%
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% 2007 3/12 1.3 1.3 67.3% 63.0% 35.7% 65.8% 42.2% 54.0% 39.2%
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% 2008 5/12 2.0 2.8 63.2% 57.2% 55.1% 52.6% 36.8% 56.2% 37.5%
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% 2009 3/4 0.3 1.7 65.4% 61.0% 39.6% 34.8% 50.0% 53.6% 35.7%
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8% — 14/92 1.4 2.4 63.2% 58.7% 43.8% 50.2% 38.0% 53.2% 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues María Emilia Salerni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45 2000 1504 109.8 — — — — +39 — — 37.5% -0.62 1–1 0–1 — 0.00
18 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66 2001 1509 116.0 — — — — +5 +40 — 40.0% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.01
19 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26 2002 1486 112.7 — — — — -18 +71 — 38.5% -0.65 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 -0.30
20 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71 2003 1431 92.2 -0.98 -1.47 0.654 41.2% — +38 — 14.3% -2.79 0–2 — — -0.15
21 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46 2004 1541 120.5 — — — — +13 — — 69.6% +1.35 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 100.3 +0.32
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02 2005 1452 102.3 -1.73 -1.65 0.651 40.5% +23 — — 21.1% -2.00 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.3 -0.22
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01 2007 1500 104.9 -0.84 -2.03 0.853 47.0% -41 +12 — 53.8% +0.15 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.8 +0.42
25 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46 2008 1469 98.0 +0.27 -2.66 0.855 47.3% — +26 — 32.1% -1.14 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.75
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67 2009 1452 99.7 -2.16 -2.18 0.770 44.1% — +32 — 40.0% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.29
27 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50 — 1556 111.1 -0.86 -2.19 0.787 45.1% +9 +35 — 38.5% -0.76 11–20 (35%) 10–12 (45%) 95.4 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.