H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Mary Pierce H2H: 1-2

Mary Pierce holds a 2–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 2–0 on carpet, while Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2006 Paris fourth round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 10, 2006* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Mary Pierce #6 6-2 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 Match data
Feb 10, 2005* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Mary Pierce #27 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #41 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Hobart WTA 250 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #64 7-5 6-4 Mary Pierce #129 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18