H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 0-1

Michaella Krajicek holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Michaella Krajicek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Michaella Krajicek won the 2005 Libéma Open round of 16 6-3 3-6 6-3.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Michaella Krajicek #99 6-3 3-6 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #34 Match data Jun 17, 2005* R16 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues — #16 2,505 1,833 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Michaella Krajicek — #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,673 0 3
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,538 0 3
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,539 0 3
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,508 0 3
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,590 0 3
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,563 0 3
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,546 0 3
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,568 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 — — — — — — —
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,619 0 11 — — — — — — —
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,542 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 51.1% 45.6% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66 2007 1674 134.7 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -38 +107 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.44
19 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26 2008 1538 99.5 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +19 -25 +205 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.7 +0.72
20 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71 2009 1539 115.0 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +23 — +166 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.23
21 2004 1708 129.9 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46 2010 1508 96.4 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +33 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02 2011 1591 120.3 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +34 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.99
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64 2012 1563 112.2 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +62 -55 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.18
24 2007 1683 135.2 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -107 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.10 2013 1537 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +54 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.29
25 2008 1819 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -58 +97 -277 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -0.42 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +171 -46 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.68 2015 1550 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2010 1569 122.6 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -22 +187 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1784 138.1 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -113 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.93 2017 1530 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -30 +158 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +154 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1492 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1503 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -113 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.52 — 1803 124.7 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -85 +78 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.