H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-1

Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Australian Open fourth round 4-2 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Monica Seles #10 4-2 (ret.) Anabel Medina Garrigues #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 — — — — — — —