H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 2-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2005 Strasbourg semifinal 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 21, 2005* Strasbourg WTA 500 SF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 6-4 6-1 Nathalie Dechy #16 Match data
Jun 23, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Dechy #29 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #51 Match data
Jan 20, 2002* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #49 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #56 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 — — — — — — —