H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Nuria Llagostera Vives H2H: 1-0

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 1–0 lead over Nuria Llagostera Vives in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2008 Palermo round of 16 6-0 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nuria Llagostera Vives
ESP Age 46 Right-Handed 156 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-0 6-4 Nuria Llagostera Vives #95 Match data Jul 11, 2008* R16 Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,834 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Nuria Llagostera Vives #775 #35 968 1,685 78 111 41.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Nuria Llagostera Vives
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2000 4–6 40.0% #128 1,509 0 0
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 2001 8–12 40.0% #103 1,500 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 2002 1–8 11.1% #192 1,442 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 2003 1–2 33.3% #140 1,450 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 2004 4–6 40.0% #76 1,485 0 0
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 2005 20–19 51.3% #50 1,617 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2006 6–5 54.5% #275 1,624 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,567 0 9 2007 5–10 33.3% #145 1,557 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 2008 14–11 56.0% #68 1,626 0 2
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,618 0 11 2009 8–16 33.3% #146 1,562 0 2
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,541 0 11 2010 4–7 36.4% #127 1,566 0 2
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11 2011 3–9 25.0% #131 1,550 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 2 2 4 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 0 3 3 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 4 6 10 40.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 4 4 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% — 28 48 76 36.8% 49 56 105 46.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 77/147 of Nuria Llagostera Vives's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% 2004 1/10 2.0 6.0 50.8% 66.7% 31.3% 54.5% 27.3% 49.2% 40.6%
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% 2005 5/39 1.6 5.8 52.8% 62.1% 45.5% 54.2% 37.3% 54.3% 44.2%
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% 2006 2/11 1.0 2.5 47.8% 52.5% 40.4% 12.5% 28.6% 46.5% 39.3%
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% 2007 9/15 0.3 3.4 55.8% 58.6% 43.0% 61.5% 50.2% 51.6% 45.8%
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% 2008 17/25 1.4 4.6 53.5% 62.2% 47.0% 49.9% 51.9% 55.0% 45.3%
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% 2009 21/24 1.2 5.7 50.7% 63.1% 40.0% 53.6% 47.6% 51.6% 43.8%
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% 2010 10/11 0.7 4.3 54.1% 62.1% 42.3% 53.8% 48.4% 53.4% 39.3%
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% 2011 12/12 1.3 5.8 49.8% 61.0% 42.0% 46.3% 40.8% 51.5% 44.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Nuria Llagostera Vives
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71 2000 1510 109.4 — — — — — +32 — 45.8% -0.33 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.01
21 2004 1708 129.8 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46 2001 1500 109.9 — — — — +59 +14 — 45.8% -0.60 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 97.9 +0.82
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02 2002 1443 104.5 — — — — +95 -4 — 27.3% -1.77 0–4 (0%) — — -0.25
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64 2003 1450 110.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 0–2 — — -0.05
24 2007 1682 135.1 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -106 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.01 2004 1486 108.9 -1.40 -1.05 0.800 45.0% +38 -8 — 44.0% -0.08 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.0 -0.15
25 2008 1820 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -59 +96 -278 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 97.9 -0.46 2005 1618 123.7 -0.47 +0.31 0.967 49.5% -57 +62 — 49.4% -0.33 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.4 +0.18
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +170 -48 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.67 2006 1625 118.7 -2.02 -1.39 0.733 42.6% -39 — — 58.3% +0.29 2–2 (50%) — — -0.05
27 2010 1568 122.5 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -21 +188 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.63 2007 1557 102.8 -2.20 +0.35 0.946 48.8% -23 +78 — 31.0% -1.21 0–1 1–1 — -0.03
28 2011 1783 138.0 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -112 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.92 2008 1627 122.9 0.00 +0.20 1.006 50.2% -58 +58 — 55.4% +0.36 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 98.5 -0.25
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -31 +157 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56 2009 1563 117.9 -2.95 +0.09 0.904 47.7% +2 +47 — 41.8% -0.65 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 98.4 -0.33
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +153 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.16 2010 1567 113.6 -0.81 -2.10 0.844 47.0% -9 +56 — 36.0% -0.80 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -0.25
31 2014 1491 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.24 2011 1551 125.4 -0.89 +0.18 0.911 48.0% -20 +59 — 32.1% -0.79 1–3 (25%) — — -1.00
Career — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -114 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.50 — 1685 122.8 -1.41 -0.16 0.921 48.3% -20 +45 — 44.5% -0.46 22–41 (35%) 21–15 (58%) 97.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.