H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 2-4

Patty Schnyder holds a 4–2 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Patty Schnyder leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 Rome second round 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 11, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 6-3 6-2 Patty Schnyder #43 Match data
Aug 19, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Patty Schnyder #20 6-2 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #21 Match data
Aug 13, 2007 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Patty Schnyder #16 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data
Mar 2, 2007* Doha WTA 500 R16 Hard Patty Schnyder #13 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 Match data
May 5, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Patty Schnyder #13 7-6(2) 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 Match data
Jun 14, 2004 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Anabel Medina Garrigues #58 6-2 6-4 Patty Schnyder #17 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Patty Schnyder #278 #7 3,050 1,987 492 346 58.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1996 7–9 43.8% #64 1,587 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,710 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,910 0 5
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,818 0 8
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2004 31–22 58.5% #14 1,793 0 8
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,928 0 10
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,898 0 10
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,879 0 10
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2008 33–21 61.1% #14 1,827 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,755 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 2011 3–9 25.0% #55 1,667 0 11
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,631 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,627 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11