H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Silvia Farina Elia H2H: 0-3
Silvia Farina Elia holds a 3–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Silvia Farina Elia leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Silvia Farina Elia won the 2005 Amelia Island third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 54
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-2 6-2 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| May 21, 2004* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-0 3-6 6-4 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2001* | Sopot | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Silvia Farina Elia | 6-4 0-6 7-5 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Silvia Farina Elia | #32 | #11 | 1,838 | 1,943 | 365 | 309 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Silvia Farina Elia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #194 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #69 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #52 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #43 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #19 | 1,901 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #26 | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | 2001 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #14 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 | 2003 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #24 | 1,719 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #32 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |