H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues and Tamarine Tanasugarn are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2004 Beijing fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 24, 2004* Beijing WTA 500 R16 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #48 6-4 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #97 Match data
Nov 7, 2000* Kuala Lumpur WTA 500 R32 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #31 6-3 6-1 Anabel Medina Garrigues #120 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4