H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-1
Anabel Medina Garrigues and Tamira Paszek are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2011 Indian Wells first round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 6-1 6-1 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Mar 8, 2011* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard |
| Tamira Paszek | 6-3 7-5 | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data | Oct 25, 2007* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,834 | 310 | 278 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #39 | 1,708 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,689 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,682 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #22 | 1,819 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,783 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #50 | 1,618 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,541 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,491 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |