H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 7-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 7–1 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2009 Wimbledon second round 7-6(5) 6-3.

ESP Age 44 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
7 – 1
8 main-draw meetings
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 7-6(5) 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #64 Match data Jun 25, 2009* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-0 3-6 6-0 Tathiana Garbin #78 Match data Jul 12, 2008* QF Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 3-6 7-5 2-2 (ret.) Tathiana Garbin #54 Match data May 7, 2008* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #24 6-4 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #75 Match data Jul 23, 2006* F Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 6-3 1-6 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #97 Match data Feb 9, 2006* R32 Paris Indoor Open WTA 500 Carpet
Anabel Medina Garrigues #46 6-2 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #56 Match data Oct 28, 2004* R32 Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tathiana Garbin #51 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #91 Match data Apr 19, 2001* R32 Budapest Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anabel Medina Garrigues #90 6-4 2-6 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #54 Match data Mar 1, 2001* R32 Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues — #16 2,505 1,833 310 278 52.7% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,562 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2004 25–23 52.1% #39 1,708 0 2 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,744 0 4 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,689 0 6 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,682 0 7 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2008 41–25 62.1% #22 1,819 0 8 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,568 0 9 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,783 0 11 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 2012 23–26 46.9% #50 1,619 0 11 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,542 0 11 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,491 0 11 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 12 12 24 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 14 14 28 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 21 15 36 58.3% 18 7 25 72.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 19 18 37 51.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 4 13 17 23.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 8 13 21 38.1% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2013 2 8 10 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2014 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 149 274 45.6% 168 99 267 62.9% 15 21 36 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2% — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 326/508 of Anabel Medina Garrigues's and 128/252 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 6/48 1.8 0.7 78.0% 58.3% 59.5% 62.0% 59.9% 58.6% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/51 2.2 1.8 64.4% 56.8% 36.3% 52.9% 45.1% 49.6% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 24/58 0.8 1.8 61.8% 56.1% 49.6% 49.2% 58.3% 53.5% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 42/47 1.2 1.7 62.3% 63.3% 47.4% 49.5% 51.9% 57.3% 44.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 51/66 1.1 1.0 67.2% 61.0% 52.7% 53.2% 53.7% 58.3% 47.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 47/59 1.1 1.7 65.4% 63.4% 45.4% 46.8% 51.9% 56.9% 46.0% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2010 40/43 1.1 1.8 63.9% 59.5% 46.7% 50.2% 45.9% 54.8% 46.0% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2011 44/56 0.7 1.0 66.7% 62.3% 49.9% 48.2% 55.5% 58.3% 49.6% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 2012 46/49 1.5 1.3 64.2% 60.7% 46.8% 54.9% 42.5% 55.9% 42.8% 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 2013 19/27 1.9 2.3 63.2% 61.4% 43.9% 45.3% 45.3% 55.3% 44.7% 2007 25/40 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 2014 2/4 0.5 2.0 65.9% 56.8% 23.0% 63.9% 25.0% 45.3% 36.3% 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
Career — 326/588 1.2 1.5 64.9% 61.1% 48.0% 50.5% 50.6% 56.5% 45.8% — 128/381 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.4% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1495 109.4 — — — — — +46 — 37.5% -0.88 0–2 0–1 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 1563 117.3 — — — — -85 +93 — 48.8% +0.08 4–10 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 93.0 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1688 129.0 — — — — -48 — — 75.0% +1.87 2–0 0–1 — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1613 108.3 — — — — 0 +20 — 49.2% +0.02 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 102.6 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1708 129.9 +1.41 +0.60 1.118 51.8% -57 +9 -121 53.7% +0.07 6–8 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 98.9 -1.46 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2005 1745 135.2 -1.51 +1.69 0.965 49.2% -99 +158 -209 53.6% +0.26 6–6 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.7 -2.02 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2006 1689 128.8 -1.72 -0.23 0.958 49.1% -75 +209 -104 55.6% +0.38 13–6 (68%) 4–3 (57%) 104.3 +2.64 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2007 1683 135.2 +0.95 +0.79 1.039 50.5% -107 +315 — 53.6% +0.32 7–11 (39%) 8–3 (73%) 98.9 +0.10 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2008 1819 137.4 +2.98 +3.19 1.133 52.6% -58 +97 -277 58.5% +0.61 11–11 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 98.0 -0.42 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2009 1684 126.3 +0.93 +1.02 1.069 51.3% -23 +171 -46 52.7% +0.20 11–6 (65%) 5–2 (71%) 104.7 +2.68 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93
27 2010 1569 122.6 -1.00 +1.31 1.018 50.4% -22 +187 — 44.7% -0.10 4–8 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.62 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2011 1784 138.1 +2.59 +4.74 1.189 53.8% -113 +101 — 61.8% +0.86 2–8 (20%) 6–7 (46%) 94.4 -1.93 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2012 1619 120.1 +0.13 -0.99 0.970 49.5% -30 +158 -55 49.1% +0.03 5–9 (36%) 9–4 (69%) 97.5 +1.56 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 2013 1542 118.6 -0.14 +0.99 1.001 49.5% -27 +154 -29 38.7% -0.87 2–10 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 91.4 -1.17 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40
31 2014 1492 90.1 -2.24 -1.41 0.663 41.1% — — — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — +0.23 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
Career — 1834 132.6 +0.82 +1.48 1.053 51.0% -62 +135 -113 52.6% +0.21 79–99 (44%) 54–55 (50%) 94.1 +0.52 — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.