H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 7-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 7–1 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 4–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2009 Wimbledon second round 7-6(5) 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
7 1
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 25, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 7-6(5) 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #64 Match data
Jul 12, 2008* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #31 6-0 3-6 6-0 Tathiana Garbin #78 Match data
May 7, 2008* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #32 3-6 7-5 2-2 (ret.) Tathiana Garbin #54 Match data
Jul 23, 2006* Palermo WTA 250 F Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #24 6-4 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #75 Match data
Feb 9, 2006* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 6-3 1-6 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #97 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #46 6-2 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #56 Match data
Apr 19, 2001* Budapest WTA 250 R32 Clay Tathiana Garbin #51 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #91 Match data
Mar 1, 2001* Acapulco WTA 250 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #90 6-4 2-6 6-3 Tathiana Garbin #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,710 167 207 44.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,468 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2000 23–19 54.8% #42 1,629 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,577 0 1
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,557 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2004 11–18 37.9% #58 1,535 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,557 0 1
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,628 0 1
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,647 0 1
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,597 0 1
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,575 0 1
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,569 0 1