H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 3-1

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 3–1 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–0 on clay, while Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2006 Berlin second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anabel Medina Garrigues
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 49 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2006* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #25 6-1 6-2 Tatiana Panova #170 Match data
May 4, 2005* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 7-6(4) 6-2 Tatiana Panova #89 Match data
Sep 13, 2001* Bahia WTA 500 R32 Hard Tatiana Panova #44 4-6 6-1 6-3 Anabel Medina Garrigues #57 Match data
Jul 14, 2001* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #72 6-1 6-2 Tatiana Panova #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,486 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,475 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,472 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,584 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,698 0 0
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,664 0 0
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,752 0 0
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,595 0 0
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,470 0 0
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 — — — — — — —
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 — — — — — — —