H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Vera Dushevina H2H: 1-3

Vera Dushevina holds a 3–1 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Vera Dushevina leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Vera Dushevina won the 2009 Tournament of Champions round-robin match 2-6 6-1 7-5.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 3
4 main draw meetings
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 2, 2009 Tournament of Champions WTA Finals RR Hard Vera Dushevina #48 2-6 6-1 7-5 Anabel Medina Garrigues #28 Match data
Aug 1, 2009* Istanbul WTA 250 QF Hard Vera Dushevina #49 6-1 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #21 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Vera Dushevina #67 6-3 6-4 Anabel Medina Garrigues #17 Match data
May 21, 2005* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #42 6-7(2) 7-5 6-1 Vera Dushevina #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Vera Dushevina #741 #31 1,490 1,786 143 172 45.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Vera Dushevina
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2002 0–1 0.0% #473 1,485 0 0
16 2003 5–4 55.6% #113 1,552 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 2004 12–16 42.9% #63 1,590 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 2005 19–19 50.0% #40 1,657 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 2006 12–22 35.3% #97 1,609 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 2007 19–15 55.9% #40 1,747 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 2008 12–17 41.4% #89 1,681 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 2009 24–18 57.1% #43 1,762 0 1
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 2010 19–19 50.0% #54 1,757 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 2011 12–17 41.4% #86 1,724 0 1
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 2012 5–15 25.0% #146 1,534 0 1
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2013 4–8 33.3% #124 1,554 0 1
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2014 0–1 0.0% #463 1,541 0 1
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11