H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 4-2

Anabel Medina Garrigues holds a 4–2 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anabel Medina Garrigues leads 3–1 on clay, while Virginia Ruano Pascual leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the 2009 Marbella fourth round 6-2 6-3.

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 10, 2009* Marbella WTA 250 R16 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #20 6-2 6-3 Virginia Ruano Pascual #106 Match data
Oct 23, 2008* Luxembourg WTA 500 R32 Hard Anabel Medina Garrigues #22 6-2 6-1 Virginia Ruano Pascual #104 Match data
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Virginia Ruano Pascual #96 6-3 2-6 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #26 Match data
Jul 26, 2001* Sopot WTA 250 R32 Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #57 7-5 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #48 Match data
May 19, 2001* Antwerp WTA 500 QF Clay Anabel Medina Garrigues #92 2-6 6-3 6-4 Virginia Ruano Pascual #71 Match data
May 25, 2000* Madrid WTA 500 R32 Clay Virginia Ruano Pascual #123 4-6 6-3 6-2 Anabel Medina Garrigues #242 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anabel Medina Garrigues #741 #16 2,505 1,852 310 275 53.0% 0 0 0 3 8 11
Virginia Ruano Pascual #998 #28 893 1,819 199 235 45.9% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anabel Medina Garrigues Virginia Ruano Pascual
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 0–1 0.0% #307 1,481 0 0
17 2000 2–5 28.6% #109 1,494 0 0 1991 2–2 50.0% #194 1,500 0 0
18 2001 16–20 44.4% #66 1,563 0 1 1992 1–4 20.0% #137 1,494 0 0
19 2002 9–3 75.0% #116 1,687 0 1 1993 6–10 37.5% #126 1,515 0 0
20 2003 13–12 52.0% #71 1,613 0 1 1994 0–4 0.0% #171 1,477 0 0
21 2004 25–22 53.2% #39 1,716 0 2 1995 11–13 45.8% #61 1,562 0 0
22 2005 28–23 54.9% #33 1,747 0 4 1996 8–15 34.8% #87 1,570 0 0
23 2006 34–24 58.6% #27 1,690 0 6 1997 18–10 64.3% #52 1,730 0 1
24 2007 25–22 53.2% #34 1,694 0 7 1998 22–16 57.9% #32 1,774 0 2
25 2008 41–24 63.1% #22 1,833 0 8 1999 12–16 42.9% #85 1,659 0 2
26 2009 33–26 55.9% #27 1,683 0 9 2000 8–8 50.0% #89 1,644 0 2
27 2010 18–25 41.9% #71 1,565 0 9 2001 13–18 41.9% #56 1,607 0 2
28 2011 35–21 62.5% #27 1,774 0 11 2002 19–21 47.5% #65 1,633 0 2
29 2012 23–25 47.9% #50 1,629 0 11 2003 19–17 52.8% #55 1,694 0 3
30 2013 8–19 29.6% #100 1,553 0 11 2004 12–16 42.9% #64 1,646 0 3
31 2014 0–4 0.0% #452 1,501 0 11 2005 10–18 35.7% #107 1,560 0 3
32 2006 15–13 53.6% #66 1,659 0 3
33 2007 11–14 44.0% #81 1,630 0 3
34 2008 9–12 42.9% #107 1,622 0 3
35 2009 3–5 37.5% #200 1,621 0 3
36 2010 0–2 0.0% #998 1,591 0 3