H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 0-1
Yayuk Basuki holds a 1–0 lead over Anabel Medina Garrigues in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Yayuk Basuki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Yayuk Basuki won the 2000 Pattaya third round 7-5 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2000* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 7-5 7-6(2) | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | #741 | #16 | 2,505 | 1,852 | 310 | 275 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 11 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 9–3 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #71 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #39 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2006 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #27 | 1,690 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2007 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2008 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 8 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2009 | 33–26 | 55.9% | #27 | 1,683 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #71 | 1,565 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #50 | 1,629 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2013 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,553 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,501 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |