H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 3-3

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Alison Riske-Amritraj are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Alison Riske-Amritraj leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2021 US Open first round 6-4 6-2.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 3
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 36 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 1, 2021* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #15 6-4 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #35 Match data
Aug 4, 2017* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #18 6-4 6-0 Alison Riske-Amritraj #46 Match data
Oct 2, 2016 Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #57 7-6(4) 2-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #17 Match data
Oct 17, 2014* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 6-2 6-2 Alison Riske-Amritraj #44 Match data
Jun 25, 2014* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Alison Riske-Amritraj #44 4-6 7-5 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #25 Match data
Jan 9, 2014* Hobart WTA 250 R32 Hard Alison Riske-Amritraj #55 6-3 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Alison Riske-Amritraj #1,157 #18 2,360 1,853 191 202 48.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Alison Riske-Amritraj
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2010 4–4 50.0% #115 1,554 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2011 3–8 27.3% #136 1,529 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2012 0–4 0.0% #180 1,488 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2013 11–6 64.7% #57 1,642 0 0
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2014 24–22 52.2% #43 1,713 0 1
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2015 15–24 38.5% #97 1,602 0 1
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2016 23–19 54.8% #39 1,742 0 1
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2017 21–24 46.7% #70 1,650 0 1
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2018 17–16 51.5% #62 1,632 0 1
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2019 26–23 53.1% #18 1,797 0 2
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2020 6–8 42.9% #26 1,739 0 2
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2021 16–15 51.6% #51 1,771 0 3
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2022 25–21 54.3% #41 1,750 0 3
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 2023 0–8 0.0% #659 1,614 0 3
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12