H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 3-0

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 3–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2012 Madrid Open round of 64 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
Russia Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #25 6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 Jill Craybas #136 Match data May 9, 2012* R64 Madrid Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #29 6-4 6-1 Jill Craybas #101 Match data May 26, 2010* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #33 3-6 6-3 6-3 Jill Craybas #74 Match data Jul 9, 2009* R32 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #445 #11 3,590 1,944 422 328 56.3% 0 0 0 2 10 12
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,593 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,702 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,824 0 2 — — — — — — —
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,813 0 3 — — — — — — —
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,712 0 3 — — — — — — —
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,798 0 5 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,764 0 7 — — — — — — —
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,868 0 8 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2016 26–25 51.0% #27 1,749 0 8 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2018 21–21 50.0% #42 1,806 0 12 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,797 0 12 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,802 0 12 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2021 27–19 58.7% #11 1,835 0 12 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,793 0 12 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,814 0 12 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,846 0 12 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,811 0 12 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #445 1,727 0 12 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 17 12 29 58.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 31 14 45 68.9% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 26 15 41 63.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 26 16 42 61.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 16 13 29 55.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 29 14 43 67.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 18 18 36 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 31 17 48 64.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 21 16 37 56.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2020 6 4 10 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2021 15 14 29 51.7% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2022 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2023 6 8 14 42.9% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2024 21 13 34 61.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2025 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2026 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 298 220 518 57.5% 90 74 164 54.9% 27 30 57 47.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
14 2006 1/1 2.0 4.0 52.9% 63.0% 41.7% 42.9% 50.0% 52.9% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 30.0% 25.0% 25.0% — 27.8% 14.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 14/18 1.9 3.1 57.9% 64.6% 45.1% 37.4% 48.4% 56.5% 45.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 43/44 2.0 5.1 58.9% 64.8% 43.9% 52.3% 46.7% 56.0% 44.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 54/60 2.6 5.3 59.2% 64.8% 45.4% 54.3% 46.6% 56.8% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 55/58 3.0 6.1 60.1% 67.0% 46.1% 50.9% 53.5% 58.3% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 40/44 2.4 5.6 59.2% 64.5% 41.9% 50.5% 46.8% 55.0% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 47/55 2.9 5.4 56.6% 68.7% 46.2% 52.4% 48.3% 59.1% 44.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2014 38/46 3.9 7.4 56.4% 69.2% 39.6% 55.3% 52.4% 56.4% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 38/55 2.3 5.4 65.0% 65.0% 49.8% 53.2% 46.1% 59.4% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2016 42/51 2.8 4.0 62.7% 65.6% 43.7% 49.9% 53.7% 57.3% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2017 64/64 3.0 4.5 62.3% 65.3% 46.2% 57.3% 45.7% 58.2% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2018 40/42 2.6 4.3 65.0% 66.1% 43.9% 53.5% 44.9% 58.5% 42.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2019 43/43 2.3 4.7 62.3% 64.5% 43.4% 52.8% 52.7% 56.5% 44.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2020 17/17 2.6 4.9 68.4% 63.0% 42.0% 43.8% 46.7% 56.8% 44.8% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 2021 40/46 2.5 3.5 67.9% 64.9% 45.5% 51.1% 50.1% 58.6% 44.6% 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2022 5/5 1.6 4.0 76.0% 63.4% 43.9% 59.5% 62.2% 57.8% 47.5% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 2023 26/26 3.0 4.8 62.0% 65.2% 45.9% 57.5% 47.3% 57.1% 45.2% 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 2024 44/45 3.3 4.0 61.4% 66.7% 49.9% 53.6% 49.7% 60.5% 43.2% 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 2025 18/24 3.3 4.9 60.8% 65.5% 42.7% 48.1% 49.6% 56.0% 39.6% 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 2026 5/6 2.8 5.0 55.8% 63.4% 35.4% 43.7% 16.8% 51.0% 34.4% 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 675/751 2.7 5.0 61.4% 65.7% 44.9% 52.4% 48.6% 57.5% 44.0% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2006 1497 106.7 -0.12 +2.94 0.708 42.6% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2007 1495 95.3 -1.54 +1.90 0.198 21.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1594 123.9 +0.60 +1.13 1.055 51.1% -34 -21 +41 55.0% +0.70 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.0 -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1703 137.4 +0.76 +0.27 1.001 50.1% +30 -139 -61 55.8% +0.34 4–7 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 96.6 +1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2010 1824 147.5 +0.89 +3.14 1.073 51.5% +11 -209 -176 60.6% +0.69 12–5 (71%) 6–3 (67%) 108.5 -0.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2011 1813 146.7 +2.42 +2.57 1.110 52.3% -13 -37 -201 62.8% +0.83 11–14 (44%) 8–7 (53%) 95.3 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2012 1713 124.6 -0.76 -0.32 0.950 49.0% -8 +17 -68 45.2% -0.40 7–4 (64%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 +0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2013 1799 143.5 +3.24 +0.98 1.086 51.6% +2 -43 — 58.4% +0.54 10–9 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 100.1 -0.38 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 2014 1764 137.7 +1.25 -0.29 0.980 49.9% +33 -44 -144 54.8% +0.26 13–7 (65%) 8–5 (62%) 104.1 +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2015 1869 139.6 +1.52 -0.40 0.997 49.9% +23 -165 -236 54.6% +0.17 14–3 (82%) 9–8 (53%) 108.8 -1.25 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2016 1750 138.9 +1.58 +1.71 1.055 51.0% -10 -52 -71 49.5% +0.19 7–8 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 96.0 -0.64 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2017 1833 151.2 +2.14 +2.10 1.077 51.6% +42 -19 -187 58.9% +0.68 16–9 (64%) 7–10 (41%) 101.9 -0.09 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2018 1806 145.1 +1.80 +0.68 1.031 50.5% +1 +47 -166 49.5% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 8–5 (62%) 98.9 -1.51 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2019 1797 148.1 +0.11 +1.68 1.017 50.5% +27 -20 — 51.5% +0.15 7–10 (41%) 5–3 (63%) 96.0 -0.49 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2020 1803 141.4 +0.01 +2.18 1.037 50.4% +63 -58 — 50.0% +0.20 4–2 (67%) 4–5 (44%) 102.3 -0.92 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 2021 1835 148.9 +1.86 +2.03 1.077 51.4% -27 +92 -189 58.1% +0.77 6–7 (46%) 4–9 (31%) 94.1 -0.77 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2022 1793 111.4 +0.38 +1.45 1.125 52.8% +16 — — 53.8% +0.69 0–3 (0%) — — +0.51 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 2023 1815 138.1 +0.92 +1.92 1.054 51.1% -40 +71 — 50.8% +0.34 6–3 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.6 -0.81 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 2024 1846 155.5 +3.69 +0.67 1.095 51.8% +87 -44 -230 56.0% +0.51 6–8 (43%) 7–2 (78%) 100.6 -0.60 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 2025 1811 137.4 -0.74 -2.12 0.901 47.9% +27 -60 -83 46.3% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 6–4 (60%) 104.0 -0.66 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 2026 1728 114.6 -1.24 -1.82 0.702 43.0% +26 — — 7.7% -2.46 0–1 0–1 — -0.26 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1944 149.9 +1.44 +1.21 1.037 50.8% +15 -30 -132 54.5% +0.35 137–115 (54%) 101–91 (53%) 100.2 -0.90 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.