H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 3-5

Kiki Bertens holds a 5–3 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2019 Osaka fourth round 6-1 7-5.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 20, 2019* Osaka WTA 250 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 6-1 7-5 Kiki Bertens #8 Match data
Aug 29, 2019* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kiki Bertens #7 7-5 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #45 Match data
Feb 2, 2019* St. Petersburg WTA 500 QF Hard Kiki Bertens #8 6-2 3-6 6-0 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #32 Match data
Jan 17, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #44 3-6 6-3 6-3 Kiki Bertens #9 Match data
Sep 26, 2018* Wuhan WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #39 6-4 6-2 Kiki Bertens #11 Match data
Mar 23, 2016* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kiki Bertens #108 6-1 4-6 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #28 Match data
Jun 12, 2015* 's Hertogenbosch WTA 250 R16 Grass Kiki Bertens #132 6-2 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #40 Match data
May 29, 2014* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Kiki Bertens #148 5-7 6-4 3-0 (ret.) Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #25 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,015 214 168 56.0% 0 2 0 3 6 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Kiki Bertens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,581 0 1
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,552 0 1
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,580 0 1
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2016 27–19 58.7% #22 1,723 0 2
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,684 0 5
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2018 46–22 67.6% #9 1,912 0 8
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2019 54–25 68.4% #9 1,897 0 10
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,883 0 11
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2021 1–7 12.5% #25 1,749 0 11
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12