H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 3-2

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 3–2 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 5-7 7-6(6) 6-0.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
UKR Age 37 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 16, 2017* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lesia Tsurenko #30 5-7 7-6(6) 6-0 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #20 Match data
May 2, 2016 Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #26 6-2 6-1 Lesia Tsurenko #41 Match data
Jan 16, 2013* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Lesia Tsurenko #85 7-5 3-6 7-5 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #23 Match data
Jan 5, 2013* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #36 4-6 6-1 6-2 Lesia Tsurenko #116 Match data
Jun 22, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #14 6-4 7-6(3) Lesia Tsurenko #141 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Lesia Tsurenko #370 #23 2,030 1,889 180 200 47.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Lesia Tsurenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #284 1,483 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2010 1–3 25.0% #155 1,468 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2011 3–7 30.0% #113 1,467 0 0
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2012 7–12 36.8% #116 1,485 0 0
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2013 11–18 37.9% #68 1,507 0 0
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2014 4–8 33.3% #92 1,511 0 0
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2015 22–17 56.4% #33 1,738 0 1
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2016 19–19 50.0% #57 1,728 0 2
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2017 22–24 47.8% #42 1,699 0 3
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2018 26–18 59.1% #27 1,814 0 4
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2019 14–14 50.0% #73 1,734 0 4
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2020 1–3 25.0% #146 1,746 0 4
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 2021 6–10 37.5% #118 1,738 0 4
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12 2022 10–11 47.6% #137 1,745 0 4
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12 2023 24–15 61.5% #31 1,866 0 4
35 2024 10–20 33.3% #115 1,693 0 4