H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 2-2

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Lucie Safarova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2015 Moscow fourth round 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3.

RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
CZE Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 23, 2015* Moscow WTA 500 R16 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #31 6-1 6-7(2) 6-3 Lucie Safarova #9 Match data
May 26, 2015* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lucie Safarova #13 7-6(6) 7-6(9) Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #39 Match data
Jan 8, 2011* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #21 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 Lucie Safarova #33 Match data
Jun 17, 2010* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Lucie Safarova #26 6-4 3-6 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,929 351 270 56.5% 0 0 0 2 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,665 0 2
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,778 0 3
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2008 15–19 44.1% #63 1,640 0 4
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,768 0 4
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,722 0 4
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,797 0 4
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2012 27–22 55.1% #17 1,771 0 4
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,797 0 5
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,858 0 5
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,829 0 6
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2016 14–18 43.8% #62 1,696 0 7
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,791 0 7
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,754 0 7
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12