H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Shuai Peng H2H: 1-2

Shuai Peng holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Shuai Peng leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2015 Madrid second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2015* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #41 6-1 6-2 Shuai Peng #24 Match data
Jan 15, 2015* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Shuai Peng #21 1-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #23 Match data
May 13, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Shuai Peng #32 6-1 7-6(2) Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,890 300 258 53.8% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,678 0 0
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,727 0 0
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,737 0 0
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2008 24–22 52.2% #40 1,706 0 0
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,770 0 0
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,742 0 0
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,817 0 0
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2012 21–22 48.8% #40 1,699 0 0
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,657 0 0
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,743 0 0
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,698 0 0
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2016 8–10 44.4% #84 1,711 0 1
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2017 37–21 63.8% #27 1,815 0 2
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 2018 1–8 11.1% #125 1,741 0 2
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,679 0 2
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,636 0 2