H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2010 Miami second round 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 35
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | Mar 24, 2010* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #401 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,945 | 419 | 326 | 56.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4 | 12 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 5 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,764 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #27 | 1,734 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,807 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,801 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #11 | 1,834 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,847 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,728 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |