H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-4

Venus Williams holds a 4–2 lead over Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 4–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-4 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova
RUS Age 35 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 26, 2017* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Venus Williams #17 6-4 7-6(3) Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #27 Match data
Aug 6, 2014* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Venus Williams #26 6-1 3-6 6-2 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #24 Match data
Feb 20, 2010* Dubai WTA 1000 QF Hard Venus Williams #5 6-3 6-4 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #38 Match data
Oct 8, 2009* Beijing WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #39 3-6 6-1 6-4 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Oct 1, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #40 7-6(6) 7-5 Venus Williams #3 Match data
Feb 19, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R32 Hard Venus Williams #6 6-0 6-1 Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova #400 #11 3,590 1,936 415 324 56.2% 0 0 0 8 4 12
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2006 0–1 0.0% #377 1,497 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #286 1,494 0 0 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 2008 10–8 55.6% #45 1,592 0 0 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 2009 24–20 54.5% #40 1,701 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 2010 39–21 65.0% #21 1,822 0 2 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2011 37–21 63.8% #16 1,830 0 3 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2012 21–23 47.7% #36 1,716 0 3 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2013 33–22 60.0% #26 1,799 0 5 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2014 26–20 56.5% #24 1,763 0 7 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2015 34–21 61.8% #28 1,867 0 8 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2016 23–23 50.0% #27 1,744 0 8 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2017 41–23 64.1% #15 1,832 0 11 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 2018 20–20 50.0% #42 1,805 0 12 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 2019 22–21 51.2% #31 1,796 0 12 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 2020 9–8 52.9% #38 1,800 0 12 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 2021 24–18 57.1% #11 1,826 0 12 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 2022 2–3 40.0% #367 1,786 0 12 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 2023 14–12 53.8% #58 1,812 0 12 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 2024 25–20 55.6% #30 1,839 0 12 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 2025 11–12 47.8% #47 1,808 0 12 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 2026 0–6 0.0% #400 1,725 0 12 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47