H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Anastasija Sevastova H2H: 1-2
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasia Potapova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2021 Charleston 1 second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2021* | Charleston 1 | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 6-3 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Jul 27, 2019* | Jurmala | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-2 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| May 1, 2019* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Anastasija Sevastova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |