H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anastasia Potapova vs Varvara Gracheva H2H: 1-1
Anastasia Potapova and Varvara Gracheva are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on clay, while Varvara Gracheva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Varvara Gracheva won the 2023 Beijing second round 6-2 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 25
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2023 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Varvara Gracheva | 6-2 3-6 6-1 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2022* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 7-5 6-3 | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
| Apr 27, 2021 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 6-4 7-6(2) | Varvara Gracheva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Varvara Gracheva | #95 | #39 | 1,290 | 1,833 | 85 | 117 | 42.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasia Potapova | Varvara Gracheva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2022 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #66 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #95 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |