H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Kiki Bertens H2H: 1-2
Kiki Bertens holds a 2–1 lead over Anastasija Sevastova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2019 Madrid fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 34
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2019* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-2 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| May 8, 2018* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Kiki Bertens | 6-1 6-4 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| May 12, 2017* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-3 6-3 | Kiki Bertens | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Kiki Bertens | #25 | #4 | 5,430 | 2,015 | 214 | 168 | 56.0% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Kiki Bertens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #63 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #22 | 1,723 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #9 | 1,912 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 54–25 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,897 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 13–6 | 68.4% | #9 | 1,883 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |