H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Lucie Safarova H2H: 0-2

Lucie Safarova holds a 2–0 lead over Anastasija Sevastova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lucie Safarova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lucie Safarova won the 2017 Taipei round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Lucie Safarova
Czech Republic Age 39 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lucie Safarova #55 6-2 6-4 Anastasija Sevastova #32 Match data Feb 3, 2017* R16 Taipei International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Lucie Safarova #24 6-4 7-5 Anastasija Sevastova #64 Match data Jul 15, 2010* R32 Prague Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lucie Safarova #1,269 #5 4,055 1,930 354 273 56.5% 0 0 0 1 6 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Lucie Safarova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 2005 15–9 62.5% #47 1,664 0 2
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 2006 21–21 50.0% #42 1,625 0 3
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1 2007 28–16 63.6% #23 1,779 0 3
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1 2008 17–20 45.9% #63 1,652 0 4
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2009 32–23 58.2% #41 1,772 0 4
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 2010 27–23 54.0% #33 1,742 0 4
24 — — — — — — — 2011 34–23 59.6% #25 1,799 0 4
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2012 27–23 54.0% #17 1,749 0 4
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2013 26–22 54.2% #29 1,792 0 5
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2014 36–23 61.0% #16 1,860 0 5
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 2015 31–21 59.6% #9 1,831 0 6
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 2016 15–19 44.1% #62 1,698 0 7
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2017 35–19 64.8% #30 1,797 0 7
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2018 10–11 47.6% #105 1,758 0 7
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,722 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Lucie Safarova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 11 11 22 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 26 16 42 61.9% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 8 13 21 38.1% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 28 15 43 65.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2013 15 13 28 53.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2014 22 15 37 59.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2016 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 25 11 36 69.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2018 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — 207 170 377 54.9% 101 69 170 59.4% 36 28 64 56.2% 10 6 16 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 526/627 of Lucie Safarova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Lucie Safarova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 3/24 3.3 6.3 61.3% 63.5% 37.8% 57.1% 34.5% 54.2% 33.3%
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% 2006 22/42 4.4 4.3 59.5% 63.3% 47.8% 57.9% 34.3% 57.0% 39.7%
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% 2007 42/44 4.2 4.2 60.1% 71.1% 46.9% 56.3% 47.7% 61.6% 42.7%
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% 2008 23/37 3.3 5.7 60.1% 66.6% 41.4% 55.8% 37.6% 56.4% 40.7%
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6% 2009 50/55 3.5 3.6 61.3% 70.3% 50.0% 54.0% 48.5% 62.4% 42.0%
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% 2010 49/50 3.8 3.8 64.8% 67.9% 42.6% 53.4% 44.5% 58.9% 40.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 49/57 4.4 4.5 60.0% 71.2% 49.2% 61.0% 49.1% 62.1% 39.7%
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2012 43/50 3.4 4.1 62.6% 67.6% 49.4% 64.0% 44.8% 60.5% 40.9%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2013 37/48 3.2 4.1 62.7% 66.7% 46.4% 51.8% 43.1% 59.1% 40.7%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2014 58/59 4.6 4.0 62.9% 70.3% 48.6% 61.4% 45.7% 62.3% 41.7%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% 2015 47/52 5.4 3.6 64.5% 72.2% 55.2% 59.9% 43.2% 66.2% 41.1%
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% 2016 29/34 4.8 3.9 62.8% 72.1% 47.2% 54.8% 40.2% 62.5% 39.9%
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2017 53/54 6.1 3.9 61.7% 71.2% 47.6% 59.4% 46.6% 62.4% 42.8%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2018 21/21 3.7 3.7 64.1% 68.1% 49.9% 54.0% 42.6% 61.7% 39.4%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% — 526/627 4.3 4.1 62.2% 69.5% 48.1% 57.6% 44.6% 61.4% 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Lucie Safarova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1664 122.6 -0.20 -3.35 0.726 43.4% -80 -54 -11 58.3% +0.52 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.2 -0.78
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 2006 1625 126.1 +0.16 -2.92 0.922 48.5% -75 +74 — 47.4% -0.12 8–5 (62%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -1.14
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72 2007 1779 146.9 +4.80 -0.13 1.112 51.9% -65 +16 -63 62.4% +0.75 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 96.2 -1.99
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25 2008 1653 117.3 +0.42 -2.52 0.932 48.4% +26 +9 — 45.5% -0.10 6–3 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +1.17
22 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02 2009 1772 143.9 +5.70 -1.16 1.115 51.8% +20 -73 — 58.5% +0.50 5–12 (29%) 9–7 (56%) 97.7 -0.32
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 2010 1742 141.4 +3.21 -2.15 0.974 49.4% -24 +77 -109 53.1% +0.25 13–8 (62%) 6–9 (40%) 100.0 -2.46
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1799 143.2 +5.52 -2.69 1.049 50.8% +15 -4 -201 54.2% +0.32 20–10 (67%) 7–11 (39%) 102.4 -0.94
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2012 1749 143.1 +4.49 -1.12 1.036 50.7% 0 +128 -149 49.5% +0.03 6–5 (55%) 9–6 (60%) 101.5 +0.27
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2013 1793 131.9 +3.17 -1.51 0.995 49.7% -13 +15 -193 55.2% +0.13 8–12 (40%) 11–6 (65%) 98.2 +0.73
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2014 1860 152.7 +5.54 -0.04 1.107 51.8% -25 -11 -144 58.6% +0.66 14–13 (52%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -2.02
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 2015 1831 150.7 +6.98 +0.95 1.214 53.0% -25 +69 -92 59.2% +0.63 7–11 (39%) 14–18 (44%) 93.5 -0.85
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 2016 1699 127.4 +3.91 -1.84 1.063 50.8% -25 +208 +26 47.2% -0.12 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 100.1 +0.56
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2017 1797 139.6 +4.59 -0.45 1.139 52.5% +18 +47 0 62.4% +0.96 13–8 (62%) 10–11 (48%) 100.1 +0.88
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2018 1758 134.2 +2.91 -1.66 1.027 50.2% +1 +52 +77 52.0% +0.08 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 90.8 -1.01
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1723 125.9 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -4 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1676 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1732 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 — 1931 145.7 +4.38 -1.15 1.062 51.0% -13 +46 -65 55.2% +0.37 120–113 (52%) 100–110 (48%) 97.0 -1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.