H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anastasija Sevastova vs Shuai Peng H2H: 4-0

Anastasija Sevastova holds a 4–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2017 Cincinnati Open first round 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anastasija Sevastova
Latvia Age 36 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anastasija Sevastova #16 3-6 6-4 6-2 Shuai Peng #25 Match data Aug 16, 2017* R64 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anastasija Sevastova #35 6-4 6-3 Shuai Peng #57 Match data Feb 23, 2017* R16 Dubai Tennis Championships Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anastasija Sevastova #59 6-1 6-1 Shuai Peng #44 Match data Jul 9, 2010* R16 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Anastasija Sevastova #74 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 Shuai Peng #51 Match data May 8, 2010* SF Estoril Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anastasija Sevastova #499 #11 3,366 1,956 209 178 54.0% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2007 1–1 50.0% #261 1,510 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2009 5–9 35.7% #79 1,531 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2010 22–15 59.5% #45 1,699 0 1 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2011 12–18 40.0% #98 1,622 0 1 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2012 0–1 0.0% #184 1,605 0 1 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2013 2–2 50.0% #148 1,618 0 1 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2015 5–3 62.5% #113 1,650 0 1 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2016 22–19 53.7% #34 1,713 0 1 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2017 37–24 60.7% #16 1,821 0 2 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2018 44–22 66.7% #11 1,918 0 3 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2019 27–22 55.1% #27 1,759 0 4 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2020 1–9 10.0% #54 1,649 0 4 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 2021 17–18 48.6% #70 1,712 0 4 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 2022 1–2 33.3% #680 1,699 0 4 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 2024 4–2 66.7% #481 1,712 0 4 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2
35 2025 9–11 45.0% #188 1,723 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2009 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2010 11 8 19 57.9% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2011 12 12 24 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2013 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2015 2 1 3 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2016 10 10 20 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2017 16 15 31 51.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2018 26 14 40 65.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2019 10 13 23 43.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2021 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 2022 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 5 5 10 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113 106 219 51.6% 73 51 124 58.9% 23 19 42 54.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 369/387 of Anastasija Sevastova's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2007 2/2 1.0 2.0 68.6% 61.0% 55.0% 52.2% 50.3% 59.0% 49.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2009 13/14 1.9 3.8 57.7% 60.9% 42.7% 46.5% 52.6% 53.4% 42.2% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2010 34/37 1.9 3.1 59.7% 61.0% 48.4% 50.1% 50.5% 56.0% 44.6% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2011 29/30 2.6 3.0 60.2% 61.2% 43.4% 43.8% 50.6% 54.3% 42.8% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2012 1/1 0.0 0.0 80.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% — 20.0% 28.6% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2013 4/4 5.3 6.3 52.3% 63.4% 47.3% 53.4% 39.7% 55.6% 41.3% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2015 5/8 1.8 2.4 59.9% 62.4% 47.5% 49.0% 51.4% 56.2% 43.7% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2016 39/41 2.1 2.6 56.4% 64.3% 45.3% 57.0% 48.6% 56.1% 43.1% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2017 61/61 2.1 2.3 61.2% 63.4% 47.9% 48.5% 54.1% 57.3% 45.3% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2018 62/66 3.0 2.2 60.8% 66.3% 47.8% 52.6% 50.3% 58.9% 46.2% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 2019 48/49 2.5 2.0 58.8% 64.8% 50.3% 52.2% 46.3% 58.7% 44.1% 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 2020 10/10 2.4 2.3 60.0% 55.3% 43.1% 43.3% 31.6% 50.7% 37.0% 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 2021 33/35 1.9 2.8 59.4% 62.1% 46.7% 54.4% 52.0% 55.9% 44.3% 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 2022 3/3 2.7 2.7 64.0% 64.6% 38.9% 27.2% 34.9% 55.7% 41.1% 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 2024 6/6 1.2 1.5 69.3% 65.6% 49.5% 45.5% 53.6% 60.6% 49.9% 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
35 2025 19/20 2.3 3.2 65.5% 60.6% 40.7% 52.1% 38.7% 53.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 369/387 2.3 2.6 60.1% 63.1% 46.7% 50.7% 49.1% 56.5% 44.1% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anastasija Sevastova Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 2007 1510 107.3 +0.28 -0.88 1.201 53.9% — — — 60.0% +1.60 0–1 0–1 — -0.14 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2009 1532 109.5 -0.95 -1.06 0.905 47.8% +22 -5 — 37.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -0.37 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2010 1700 136.1 +0.52 +1.27 1.013 50.4% -18 -56 — 50.0% +0.10 10–4 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 112.0 -1.72 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2011 1623 125.8 -0.67 -0.46 0.936 48.5% +20 -35 — 47.7% -0.23 2–7 (22%) 5–4 (56%) 93.7 -1.25 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2012 1606 — -4.79 -0.63 0.357 26.3% — — — — — — — — -0.02 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2013 1618 108.8 -1.89 -0.55 0.931 48.2% +29 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–0 1–0 — -0.36 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2015 1651 116.6 -0.45 +1.55 0.997 49.7% +20 -58 — 63.2% +0.10 1–2 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 103.0 +0.37 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2016 1713 129.3 +0.55 -0.36 0.984 49.6% -12 -43 -134 53.9% +0.07 5–4 (56%) 5–2 (71%) 104.2 -0.43 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2017 1821 142.6 +0.98 +2.00 1.060 51.3% -53 -13 -127 58.1% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 4–9 (31%) 102.4 +0.20 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2018 1918 151.6 +2.10 +3.32 1.125 52.4% -17 -8 -182 60.1% +0.74 17–7 (71%) 8–8 (50%) 106.2 -0.51 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2019 1759 136.0 +1.82 +0.39 1.068 51.1% -11 +149 0 56.8% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 6–5 (55%) 93.5 +2.29 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2020 1649 114.7 -2.98 -3.36 0.751 43.8% +22 — — 13.6% -2.27 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.12 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 2021 1713 129.5 -0.41 +1.61 1.003 50.1% -94 +132 +101 50.0% +0.10 7–9 (44%) 5–7 (42%) 95.5 +0.39 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 2022 1699 110.3 -1.74 +1.28 0.927 48.1% -77 — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — -0.20 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 2023 1698 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 2024 1713 111.5 +0.69 +0.90 1.267 54.9% -42 — — 75.0% +1.75 — — — +0.34 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
35 2025 1723 126.0 -2.14 -1.19 0.879 47.2% -3 +53 — 43.8% -0.58 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 104.0 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2026 1677 90.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1956 140.5 +0.50 +0.97 1.015 50.2% -21 +17 -80 52.8% +0.18 69–60 (53%) 45–45 (50%) 104.7 -0.57 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.