H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Shuai Peng H2H: 4-0
Anastasija Sevastova holds a 4–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Anastasija Sevastova leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2017 Cincinnati second round 3-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
CHN
Age 40
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2017* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-3 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2010* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-1 6-1 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
| May 8, 2010* | Estoril | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | Shuai Peng | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Shuai Peng | #820 | #14 | 2,825 | 1,890 | 300 | 258 | 53.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Shuai Peng | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #518 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #80 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #55 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #46 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #72 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #17 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #40 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #21 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #137 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #84 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #125 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #109 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |