H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Anastasija Sevastova vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 1-1
Anastasija Sevastova and Yanina Wickmayer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on grass, while Anastasija Sevastova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasija Sevastova won the 2011 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 36
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2016 | Sydney | WTA 500 | Q1 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anastasija Sevastova | 6-4 6-2 | Yanina Wickmayer | Match data |
| Jun 10, 2009* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-4 6-3 | Anastasija Sevastova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasija Sevastova | #293 | #11 | 3,366 | 1,946 | 207 | 175 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anastasija Sevastova | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #79 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2010 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #113 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2017 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2018 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,909 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2019 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #27 | 1,759 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #54 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2021 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #680 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 2024 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #481 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | 2025 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #188 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |