H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Anca Barna vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-1

Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Anca Barna
GER Age 49 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #99 6-2 6-2 Anca Barna #120 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Anca Barna #1,120 #46 747 1,687 68 106 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Anca Barna Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 0–1 0.0% #221 1,496 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1997 0–1 0.0% #303 1,485 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1999 3–7 30.0% #118 1,446 0 0 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2000 3–5 37.5% #137 1,458 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2001 4–12 25.0% #116 1,450 0 0 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2002 15–21 41.7% #62 1,524 0 0 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2003 24–25 49.0% #48 1,659 0 0 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 2004 16–28 36.4% #84 1,539 0 0 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 2005 3–6 33.3% #338 1,514 0 0 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Anca Barna Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2003 15 12 27 55.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 36 50 86 41.9% 26 41 67 38.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Anca Barna Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1496 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.27 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1997 1486 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.01 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 1999 1446 100.8 — — — — +51 +59 — 26.3% -1.47 0–1 1–1 — +0.67 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2000 1458 104.9 — — — — +43 +46 — 42.1% -0.95 1–2 (33%) — — +0.44 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2001 1451 111.4 — — — — +24 +18 — 27.8% -1.67 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.17 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2002 1525 123.4 — — — — -43 +33 — 42.4% -0.41 7–6 (54%) 6–1 (86%) 107.1 +0.34 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2003 1660 132.9 -2.52 -0.36 0.797 44.7% -19 -63 -105 49.6% +0.13 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 102.0 -1.31 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 2004 1539 109.6 -1.15 -1.61 0.830 46.1% -3 -7 -30 37.9% -0.94 8–7 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 101.7 -0.14 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 2005 1514 101.0 -0.37 -1.56 0.703 44.3% +2 — — 23.5% -1.82 1–0 0–1 — +0.16 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 1687 121.3 -1.67 -1.05 0.801 45.3% -8 +5 -58 40.1% -0.65 27–28 (49%) 17–14 (55%) 104.3 -0.17 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.