H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anca Barna vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-1
Miriam Oremans holds a 1–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2000 Australian Open first round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Miriam Oremans | 6-2 6-2 | Anca Barna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anca Barna | #1,120 | #46 | 747 | 1,688 | 68 | 106 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anca Barna | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #118 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #62 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #48 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #84 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |