H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anca Barna vs Rita Kuti-Kis H2H: 0-3
Rita Kuti-Kis holds a 3–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rita Kuti-Kis leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Kuti-Kis won the 2000 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 6-1 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2000* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-1 2-6 6-1 | Anca Barna | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1999* | Sao Paulo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-2 6-3 | Anca Barna | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-3 6-0 | Anca Barna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anca Barna | #1,120 | #46 | 747 | 1,688 | 68 | 106 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anca Barna | Rita Kuti-Kis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #118 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #62 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #48 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #84 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |