H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Anca Barna vs Sandra Cacic H2H: 0-1
Sandra Cacic holds a 1–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Cacic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cacic won the 1999 Berlin second round 7-6 6-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 51
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 1999* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sandra Cacic | 7-6 6-7 6-1 | Anca Barna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anca Barna | #1,120 | #46 | 747 | 1,688 | 68 | 106 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandra Cacic | #409 | #39 | 548 | 1,730 | 58 | 96 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anca Barna | Sandra Cacic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #310 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #114 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #78 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #118 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #60 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #82 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #188 | 1,518 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #62 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #48 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #117 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #84 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #322 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #395 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |