H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Anca Barna vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 0-3
Sandrine Testud holds a 3–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 54
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sandrine Testud | 6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | Anca Barna | Match data |
| Sep 13, 2001* | Waikoloa | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sandrine Testud | 6-2 7-5 | Anca Barna | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2001* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sandrine Testud | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Anca Barna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anca Barna | #1,120 | #46 | 747 | 1,688 | 68 | 106 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sandrine Testud | #1,203 | #9 | 2,233 | 2,019 | 309 | 236 | 56.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Anca Barna | Sandrine Testud | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #109 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #100 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #118 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #137 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #116 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #62 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #14 | 1,938 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #48 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 51–26 | 66.2% | #14 | 1,946 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #84 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #17 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 53–27 | 66.2% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #38 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #313 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 |