H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Holikova vs Gabriela Sabatini H2H: 0-1
Gabriela Sabatini holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Holikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gabriela Sabatini leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gabriela Sabatini won the 1985 Tokyo Japan Open quarterfinal 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 58
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 1985* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Gabriela Sabatini | 6-0 6-1 | Andrea Holikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Holikova | #596 | #112 | 8 | 1,652 | 33 | 61 | 35.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gabriela Sabatini | #56 | #3 | 228 | 2,398 | 607 | 182 | 76.9% | 1 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 27 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Holikova | Gabriela Sabatini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #74 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #12 | 1,947 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #9 | 2,023 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1985 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 62–16 | 79.5% | #6 | 2,264 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1986 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #126 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 61–13 | 82.4% | #4 | 2,276 | 0 | 9 |
| 19 | 1987 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #127 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #3 | 2,257 | 0 | 13 |
| 20 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #144 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 49–14 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,231 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | 1989 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #183 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 62–11 | 84.9% | #3 | 2,269 | 1 | 20 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 65–12 | 84.4% | #3 | 2,291 | 1 | 25 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #5 | 2,108 | 1 | 25 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 2,055 | 1 | 26 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 41–16 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,062 | 1 | 27 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #56 | 1,947 | 1 | 27 |