H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Holikova vs Grace Kim H2H: 1-0

Andrea Holikova holds a 1–0 lead over Grace Kim in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Holikova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Holikova won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 6-3 6-2.

TCH Age 58 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Holikova 6-3 6-2 Grace Kim Match data Jun 25, 1986* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Holikova — #112 8 1,653 33 61 35.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Grace Kim — — — 1,705 47 82 36.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Holikova Grace Kim
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1982 7–3 70.0% — 1,586 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1983 2–4 33.3% — 1,592 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1984 6–10 37.5% — 1,622 0 1
17 1985 12–11 52.2% — 1,640 0 0 1985 17–25 40.5% — 1,694 0 1
18 1986 6–17 26.1% #126 1,572 0 0 1986 10–22 31.2% — 1,605 0 1
19 1987 7–13 35.0% #127 1,529 0 0 1987 5–13 27.8% — 1,515 0 1
20 1988 6–13 31.6% #144 1,524 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,469 0 1
21 1989 2–7 22.2% #183 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Holikova Grace Kim
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1985 11 12 23 47.8% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3%
19 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 25 35 28.6% 13 21 34 38.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 7 10 30.0% — 28 35 63 44.4% 4 18 22 18.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 11 18 29 37.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Holikova Grace Kim
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1586 114.0 — — — — +73 — — 66.7% +1.10 3–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) 103.8 +1.40
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 116.1 — — — — +64 — — 30.8% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1622 113.9 — — — — +26 — +20 36.6% -1.49 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 103.7 -0.34
17 1985 1640 119.0 — — — — -28 -78 +7 49.1% -0.11 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 105.3 +0.44 1985 1695 125.4 — — — — +51 -205 -136 43.4% -0.79 6–9 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.5 -0.71
18 1986 1572 127.3 — — — — -10 -27 — 34.0% -0.94 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — -0.18 1986 1606 117.9 — — — — +47 -127 — 33.3% -1.54 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +0.14
19 1987 1530 107.0 — — — — -36 +27 +96 36.2% -0.89 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 +1.42 1987 1515 97.7 — — — — +46 — -16 32.6% -1.47 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +2.11
20 1988 1524 107.2 — — — — -65 +34 — 34.1% -1.36 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.2 -0.07 1988 1469 96.4 — — — — — -61 — 0.0% -3.90 — 0–1 — -0.26
21 1989 1499 106.9 — — — — -5 +3 — 21.1% -2.37 1–0 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1653 118.3 — — — — -28 -7 +37 37.3% -0.92 16–16 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 101.9 +1.54 — 1706 119.2 — — — — +49 -161 -47 38.2% -1.14 21–19 (53%) 11–10 (52%) 103.5 +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.