H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Andrea Holikova vs Helen Kelesi H2H: 0-1

Helen Kelesi holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Holikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Helen Kelesi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helen Kelesi won the 1988 Roland Garros round of 64 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Holikova
TCH Age 58 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Helen Kelesi
CAN Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helen Kelesi #25 6-2 6-2 Andrea Holikova #118 Match data May 26, 1988* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Holikova #596 #112 8 1,652 33 61 35.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helen Kelesi #755 #13 54 1,954 213 165 56.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Holikova Helen Kelesi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 15–15 50.0% #48 1,642 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 28–21 57.1% #39 1,745 0 1
17 1985 12–11 52.2% — 1,640 0 0 1987 22–19 53.7% #32 1,785 0 1
18 1986 6–17 26.1% #126 1,571 0 0 1988 33–19 63.5% #19 1,814 0 2
19 1987 7–13 35.0% #127 1,529 0 0 1989 36–18 66.7% #13 1,872 0 2
20 1988 6–13 31.6% #144 1,523 0 0 1990 23–17 57.5% #25 1,784 0 2
21 1989 2–7 22.2% #183 1,498 0 0 1991 26–20 56.5% #29 1,715 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1992 7–13 35.0% #128 1,632 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1993 18–13 58.1% #48 1,756 0 2
24 — — — — — — — 1994 5–10 33.3% #125 1,647 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Holikova Helen Kelesi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 11 8 19 57.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 11 7 18 61.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
17 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
18 1986 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 11 10 21 52.4% 20 5 25 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 20 9 29 69.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1988 2 6 8 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 7 8 15 46.7% 16 7 23 69.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1989 2 3 5 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 8 8 16 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 7 10 17 41.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 10 25 35 28.6% 13 21 34 38.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 7 10 30.0% — 98 77 175 56.0% 88 50 138 63.8% 9 15 24 37.5% 18 23 41 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Holikova Helen Kelesi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1642 120.5 — — — — +6 -36 — 48.0% -0.51 9–6 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 106.9 +0.84
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1745 135.4 — — — — -29 -31 -160 54.6% +0.16 12–9 (57%) 10–8 (56%) 106.9 +0.08
17 1985 1640 118.9 — — — — -28 -79 +6 49.1% -0.11 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 105.3 +0.44 1987 1785 144.2 — — — — -39 +12 -185 53.5% +0.11 8–9 (47%) 5–4 (56%) 100.3 -2.78
18 1986 1572 127.2 — — — — -10 -28 — 34.0% -0.94 1–6 (14%) 1–1 — +0.02 1988 1815 148.0 — — — — -89 +155 — 62.1% +0.90 6–8 (43%) 4–6 (40%) 96.5 -0.81
19 1987 1529 107.0 — — — — -36 +28 +97 36.2% -0.89 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 100.3 +1.45 1989 1872 151.1 — — — — -33 +146 — 64.5% +0.83 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 105.2 -2.05
20 1988 1524 107.2 — — — — -65 +34 — 34.1% -1.36 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.2 -0.07 1990 1785 139.7 — — — — -66 +217 — 60.0% +0.68 4–8 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 93.8 +0.69
21 1989 1499 106.9 — — — — -6 +3 — 21.1% -2.37 1–0 0–1 — -0.29 1991 1715 141.4 — — — — -34 +257 -139 54.7% +0.47 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 98.7 +0.82
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1633 124.6 — — — — -3 — — 46.3% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.8 -0.03
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1756 136.5 — — — — -3 +91 -126 57.6% +0.51 6–2 (75%) 6–4 (60%) 107.2 -1.21
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1647 125.5 — — — — +73 +113 — 38.7% -0.61 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.09
Career — 1653 118.2 — — — — -28 -7 +36 37.3% -0.92 16–16 (50%) 8–10 (44%) 101.9 +1.65 — 1955 146.3 — — — — -28 +126 -159 56.1% +0.37 67–61 (52%) 46–39 (54%) 104.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.