H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 3-1

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–1 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on clay, while Andrea Temesvari leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Temesvari won the 1983 Tokyo Lion Cup bronze medal match 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Andrea Temesvari
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Temesvari 6-2 6-2 Andrea Jaeger Match data Nov 27, 1983* BR Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-2 Andrea Temesvari Match data Jan 27, 1983* SF Marco Island WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-2 Andrea Temesvari Match data Sep 6, 1982* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Andrea Jaeger 4-6 7-6 6-3 Andrea Temesvari Match data May 27, 1981* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Andrea Temesvari #932 #7 109 2,021 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,770 0 1
17 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,989 0 4
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,848 0 5
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,801 0 5
21 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10 1987 1–2 33.3% #193 1,775 0 5
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10 — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 — — — — — — — 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,611 0 5
25 — — — — — — — 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,528 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.26
16 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68 1982 1771 146.3 — — — — -152 -30 -161 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -2.86
17 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09 1983 1989 163.0 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.64
18 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88 1984 1889 136.5 — — — — -78 +109 -173 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.3 +3.39
19 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 1985 1849 136.4 — — — — -49 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.35
20 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47 1986 1802 139.4 — — — — -40 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -1.37
21 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -40 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1751 135.2 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.26
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +8 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1607 122.1 — — — — -5 +82 +65 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.25
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +31 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1486 104.6 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71 — 2021 143.3 — — — — -57 +117 -110 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.