H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Ann Henricksson H2H: 2-1
Andrea Jaeger holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Henricksson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ann Henricksson won the 1986 Boca Raton first round 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Ann Henricksson | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | Andrea Jaeger | Match data |
| May 5, 1984* | Johannesburg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Andrea Jaeger | 6-3 6-2 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1980* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-0 | Ann Henricksson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Ann Henricksson | #892 | #36 | 21 | 1,756 | 147 | 210 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Ann Henricksson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #40 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #36 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #49 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #60 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #71 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #141 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #215 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |