H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 3-0

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1984 Houston round of 32 6-1 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Catherine Tanvier
FRA Age 61 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger #3 6-1 6-0 Catherine Tanvier #34 Match data Feb 2, 1984* R32 Houston WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-1 Catherine Tanvier Match data Feb 17, 1983* R32 Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-0 Catherine Tanvier Match data Apr 8, 1982* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 — 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Catherine Tanvier #752 #20 22 1,879 161 179 47.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Catherine Tanvier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4 1980 4–2 66.7% — 1,545 0 0
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7 1981 6–14 30.0% — 1,540 0 0
17 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9 1982 23–19 54.8% — 1,800 0 0
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10 1983 17–16 51.5% — 1,826 0 0
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10 1984 21–18 53.8% #30 1,777 0 0
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,939 0 10 1985 18–16 52.9% #39 1,775 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,826 0 0
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,899 0 10 1987 10–19 34.5% #96 1,618 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1988 9–16 36.0% #77 1,603 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1989 12–12 50.0% #65 1,673 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1990 9–11 45.0% #99 1,657 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1991 7–10 41.2% #104 1,603 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1992 6–7 46.2% #105 1,613 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1993 0–2 0.0% #543 1,578 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Catherine Tanvier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7% 1980 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 4 11 63.6%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1984 5 5 10 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 4 9 55.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8% — 40 45 85 47.1% 51 52 103 49.5% 28 32 60 46.7% 41 46 87 47.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Catherine Tanvier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 114.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2144 166.9 — — — — -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47 1980 1546 111.1 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% +0.79 2–0 0–1 — +0.83
16 1981 2178 174.5 — — — — +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68 1981 1540 110.2 — — — — +71 +74 +8 34.9% -1.14 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.01
17 1982 2202 173.8 — — — — +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09 1982 1801 145.8 — — — — -102 -58 -144 54.0% +0.40 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 106.1 -4.11
18 1983 2104 170.1 — — — — -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88 1983 1826 138.7 — — — — +20 -51 -192 52.0% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -0.26
19 1984 2024 144.8 — — — — +14 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 1984 1778 138.4 — — — — +11 +67 -119 52.4% +0.25 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 101.9 -0.85
20 1985 1939 112.7 — — — — +11 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.47 1985 1775 131.9 — — — — -9 +35 -111 54.3% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -0.41
21 1986 1914 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1986 1826 142.0 — — — — +17 -76 -150 47.6% -0.15 9–1 (90%) 4–3 (57%) 108.6 -1.68
22 1987 1900 104.0 — — — — — +249 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.16 1987 1619 112.9 — — — — +55 +15 +55 38.8% -0.72 5–6 (45%) 1–7 (13%) 92.3 -0.42
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1604 122.4 — — — — +7 +16 +40 40.7% -0.54 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — -1.01
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1674 141.0 — — — — -11 -62 +28 50.9% +0.16 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — -0.68
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1657 111.6 — — — — 0 -81 +75 45.0% -0.43 2–0 1–1 — +0.74
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1603 113.4 — — — — +31 -73 — 40.5% -0.43 4–1 (80%) 0–3 (0%) 101.2 +0.59
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1614 106.1 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.57 2–0 — — +1.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1578 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71 — 1879 137.0 — — — — +7 -13 -54 47.4% -0.16 49–31 (61%) 23–32 (42%) 105.2 -1.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.