H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Catherine Tanvier H2H: 3-0
Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Catherine Tanvier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1984 Houston third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-1 6-0 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-0 6-1 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1982* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Andrea Jaeger | 6-3 6-0 | Catherine Tanvier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Catherine Tanvier | #752 | #20 | 22 | 1,877 | 161 | 179 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Catherine Tanvier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 23–19 | 54.8% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1984 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1985 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #39 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,825 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1987 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #105 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |