H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 3-0

Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Chicago quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
GER Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-4 Eva Pfaff Match data Feb 19, 1983* QF Chicago WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 7-5 6-1 Eva Pfaff Match data Dec 10, 1982* QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-1 Eva Pfaff Match data Feb 4, 1982* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Eva Pfaff — #17 21 1,902 155 202 43.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Eva Pfaff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5 — — — — — — —
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
17 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10 — — — — — — —
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11 — — — — — — —
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11 1980 12–11 52.2% — 1,608 0 0
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11 1981 14–19 42.4% — 1,632 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11 1982 18–22 45.0% — 1,776 0 0
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11 1983 31–21 59.6% — 1,857 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 1984 14–14 50.0% #31 1,797 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1985 9–11 45.0% — 1,739 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1986 14–19 42.4% #58 1,690 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 1987 19–20 48.7% #44 1,744 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1988 8–17 32.0% #74 1,648 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1989 12–23 34.3% #104 1,587 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1990 3–12 20.0% #152 1,522 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 1991 1–10 9.1% #203 1,469 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 1992 0–2 0.0% #420 1,459 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Eva Pfaff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 — — — — 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 8 18 55.6%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 4 4 8 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 2 8 10 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 9 13 22 40.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2% — 35 64 99 35.4% 34 47 81 42.0% 44 40 84 52.4% 42 50 92 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Eva Pfaff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51 1977 1481 98.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.33
17 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43 1980 1608 121.1 — — — — 0 -3 — 48.0% -0.16 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.2 -0.01
20 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48 1981 1633 123.6 — — — — -26 +24 -31 45.1% -0.34 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 +3.20
21 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1982 1776 132.9 — — — — -155 -166 -35 45.2% -0.12 7–6 (54%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 -0.97
22 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19 1983 1857 145.5 — — — — -98 -98 -30 57.1% +0.32 9–8 (53%) 9–3 (75%) 108.7 +0.77
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1798 132.8 — — — — +13 -37 -34 47.5% +0.07 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 101.0 -1.40
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1740 120.9 — — — — +36 -87 +40 46.3% -0.29 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.72
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1690 126.3 — — — — +52 -69 +30 42.1% -0.32 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 101.8 -0.11
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1745 139.9 — — — — +26 -163 +22 49.4% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–3 (70%) 104.9 -1.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1649 121.4 — — — — +54 -104 +45 33.9% -1.09 5–3 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.9 -0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1588 119.7 — — — — +15 — +82 36.3% -1.10 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.64
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1522 111.6 — — — — -3 — — 33.3% -1.19 0–6 (0%) 0–2 — +0.39
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1470 118.6 — — — — +22 — — 16.0% -2.28 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.6 -0.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1460 103.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61 — 1903 135.7 — — — — -11 -66 -3 44.1% -0.41 49–53 (48%) 36–40 (47%) 102.6 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.