H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 3-0
Andrea Jaeger holds a 3–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1983 Chicago quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1983* | Chicago | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-4 6-4 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Dec 10, 1982* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Andrea Jaeger | 7-5 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1982* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-0 6-1 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |