H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1982 Seattle round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-2 Kate Latham Match data Jan 22, 1982* R16 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1 — — — — — — —
15 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5 — — — — — — —
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11 — — — — — — —
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 — — — — — — — 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.