H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Andrea Jaeger vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-0
Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1982 Seattle fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 61
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 73
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 1982* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Andrea Jaeger | 6-4 6-2 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrea Jaeger | #225 | #3 | — | 2,280 | 257 | 90 | 74.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Andrea Jaeger | Kate Latham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1979 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1980 | 62–18 | 77.5% | — | 2,169 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 61–18 | 77.2% | — | 2,179 | 0 | 7 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 65–20 | 76.5% | — | 2,170 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 50–18 | 73.5% | — | 2,091 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #42 | 2,015 | 0 | 10 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,932 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,907 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1987 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,882 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 |