H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Andrea Jaeger vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 1-0

Andrea Jaeger holds a 1–0 lead over Kay Mcdaniel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andrea Jaeger leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Andrea Jaeger won the 1980 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-0 6-3.

USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-3 Kay Mcdaniel Match data Jun 18, 1980* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Andrea Jaeger #225 #3 2,266 257 90 74.1% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Kay Mcdaniel 1,653 18 40 31.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kay Mcdaniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1979 2–2 50.0% 1,522 0 1
15 1980 62–18 77.5% #7 2,143 0 4
16 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,178 0 7 1974 2–1 66.7% 1,515 0 0
17 1982 65–20 76.5% #3 2,201 0 9
18 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,103 0 10 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,498 0 0
19 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,024 0 10 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
20 1985 5–5 50.0% 1,939 0 10 1978 2–2 50.0% 1,520 0 0
21 1986 0–1 0.0% #225 1,914 0 10 1979 10–12 45.5% 1,625 0 0
22 1987 3–2 60.0% 1,899 0 10 1980 2–12 14.3% 1,554 0 0
23 1981 0–2 0.0% 1,528 0 0
24 1982 1–3 25.0% 1,501 0 0
27 1985 1–2 33.3% 1,484 0 0
28 1986 0–3 0.0% 1,453 0 0
29 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,447 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kay Mcdaniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1979 1 1 2 50.0%
15 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 14 7 21 66.7%
16 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9% 1974 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 4 19 78.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1987 3 2 5 60.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1981 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1982 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1987 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 65 21 86 75.6% 66 20 86 76.7% 50 14 64 78.1% 75 34 109 68.8% 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 9 11 18.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Andrea Jaeger Kay Mcdaniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1979 1522 114.9 50.0% +0.75 0–1 +0.21
15 1980 2144 166.9 -20 -413 -289 74.1% +1.97 7–3 (70%) 5–1 (83%) 111.4 -7.47
16 1981 2178 174.5 +36 -158 -155 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.9 -9.68 1974 1516 99.4 +25 57.1% -0.28 1–0 +0.38
17 1982 2202 173.8 +57 -30 -141 74.7% +1.94 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.09
18 1983 2104 170.1 -4 +148 +47 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.2 -3.88 1976 1498 99.0 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 0.00
19 1984 2024 144.8 +14 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 -0.45 1977 1486 99.4 0.0% -3.00 -0.04
20 1985 1939 112.7 +11 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 -0.47 1978 1520 109.0 +104 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 +0.20
21 1986 1914 98.8 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 -0.03 1979 1625 126.4 +23 +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.41
22 1987 1900 104.0 +249 60.0% +0.70 2–0 +0.16 1980 1555 99.2 -19 +36 21.9% -2.47 1–3 (25%) 2–0 -0.34
23 1981 1528 94.7 0.0% -4.25 -0.09
24 1982 1501 104.3 +21 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 +0.49
27 1985 1485 96.2 33.3% -1.33 1–0 +0.03
28 1986 1454 95.8 14.3% -2.14 0–1 +0.25
29 1987 1447 99.8 0.0% -3.50 +0.02
Career 2266 172.3 +18 -41 -153 71.0% +1.72 44–18 (71%) 21–18 (54%) 107.9 -8.71 1653 110.7 +19 +25 +29 34.8% -1.20 8–11 (42%) 8–4 (67%) 103.3 +2.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.